18Feb

Cooling the Boat Without Compromising the Air

Dan Taylor | 18 Feb, 2026 | 0 Comments | Return|

On a submarine, heat is never free. Every system that runs hot adds to the boat’s cooling burden—which means more chilled water, more air conditioning, and more power drawn from the ship.

A Winter 2025 Naval Engineers Journal technical paper by Franklin J. Gulian, P.E., looks at a quiet but constant contributor to that burden: the Mark V catalytic burner, which protects submarine air quality by destroying trace contaminants in a closed environment. The Navy’s current catalyst performs well, but it requires the burner to operate around 500°F, and that temperature has real ship impacts—each degree up or down changes waste heat by about 74 watts.

The study asks a simple, practical question: what happens if the Mark V uses a more modern catalyst design? Specifically, it compares the current granular catalyst media to a platinum-based monolithic “honeycomb” module common in industrial emissions control. In testing, the platinum monolith removed a representative contaminant more effectively at lower temperatures than the current catalyst.

The implication is compelling: if the Mark V can run cooler while still cleaning the air, the submarine sheds waste heat. Gulian estimates that dropping operating temperature by 100°F could reduce Mark V power use by about 7.4 kW—roughly a 24% cut in waste heat from that system.

The paper also flags operational benefits sailors will appreciate: monolithic modules are cleaner to handle than granular media, and platinum catalysts can be reclaimed and recycled, potentially reducing hazardous waste. This isn’t a call for an overnight fleet change—it’s an evidence-based case that a proven industrial approach may offer the Navy a rare win-win: cleaner air, less heat, and less handling burden, with longer-duration testing as the next step.

Read the Winter 2025 NEJ issue / get access to the paper

ASNE members receive NEJ access as a core benefit. If you’re working ship defense, combat systems integration, autonomy, power/cooling, or next-gen survivability, this is the kind of analysis NEJ exists to publish.

About the Author

Related

Humans in the Loop: How Leadership Should Approach Generative AI

Humans in the Loop: How Leadership Should Approach Generative AI

The MIT report, "Humans in the Loop: The evolution of work in early experiments with Generative...

Read More >
When Lasers Join the Fight: Why Directed Energy Turns Ship Defense Into a Time Problem

When Lasers Join the Fight: Why Directed Energy Turns Ship Defense Into a Time Problem

A new Winter 2025 NEJ technical paper explains why integrating directed-energy weapons alongside tra...

Read More >
PEP26: Where the Next Generation of Naval Engineers Gets to Work

PEP26: Where the Next Generation of Naval Engineers Gets to Work

PEP26 is going on right now. Here's everything you need to know about this annual competition.

Read More >
Losing Requirements in the First 10% of Design

Losing Requirements in the First 10% of Design

A Winter 2025 NEJ paper argues that early ship design often loses requirements traceability in the f...

Read More >
Recent Advances in AI-Driven Hydrodynamic Design

Recent Advances in AI-Driven Hydrodynamic Design

AI is making hydrodynamic design faster and more effective by cutting down on expensive CFD runs, im...

Read More >
Cooling the Plume

Cooling the Plume

A Winter 2025 NEJ paper evaluates whether water mist injection inside a gas turbine exhaust duct can...

Read More >

Post a Comment